Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Turion II Neo K625

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Turion II Neo K625 Performance Spectrum

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2 / 2

1,250

+0.7%

1,241

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Turion II Neo K625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Turion II Neo K625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Turion II Neo K625 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion II Neo K625

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,241 vs 1,250).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 better than Turion II Neo K625?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion II Neo K625 is ahead with 25% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the better buy right now. Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Turion II Neo K625 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 25% higher max boost clock. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion II Neo K625 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Turion II Neo K625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.

Turion II Neo K625

The Turion II Neo K625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,241 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Turion II Neo K625 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 versus 1.5 GHz on the Turion II Neo K625 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Turion II Neo K625. The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion II Neo K625 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 scores 1,250 against the Turion II Neo K625's 1,241 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300	Turion II Neo K625
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	1.5 GHz+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Geneva (2010)
PassMark	1,250	1,241
Geekbench 6 Single	150	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	280	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion II Neo K625 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300	Turion II Neo K625
Socket	BGA956	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) / not specified (Turion II Neo K625). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100.