Celeron G1101
VS
Core 2 Duo E8335

Celeron G1101 vs Core 2 Duo E8335

Intel

Celeron G1101

2 Cores2 Thrd73 WWMax: 0.27 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E8335

2 Cores2 Thrd44 WWMax: 0.93 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1101 is positioned at rank 755 and the Core 2 Duo E8335 is on rank 1196, so the Celeron G1101 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1101

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14352%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13561%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9846%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2966%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2350%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2055%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1177%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1162%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1058%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1058%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1046%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1018%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1004%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
999%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
990%
#755
Celeron G1101
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
100%
#756
FX-8150
MSRP: $245|Avg: $50
100%
#757
Pentium G3240
MSRP: $89|Avg: $126
100%
#758
Core i5-3550S
MSRP: $205|Avg: $100
100%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
99%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
99%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
99%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
98%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#765
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#767
Core i5-4590T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $130
97%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
97%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8335

#1184
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5364%
#1185
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5285%
#1186
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4852%
#1187
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4830%
#1188
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4786%
#1190
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4622%
#1191
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4431%
#1192
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4424%
#1193
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4305%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
100%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
98%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
93%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
93%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
93%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
92%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
91%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
89%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
89%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo E8335 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron G1101 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron G1101Core 2 Duo E8335
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron G1101 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 148% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core 2 Duo E8335.
InsightCeleron G1101Core 2 Duo E8335
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+148%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1101 and Core 2 Duo E8335

Intel

Celeron G1101

The Celeron G1101 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,086 points. Launch price was $85.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8335

The Core 2 Duo E8335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,094 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1101 and Core 2 Duo E8335 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Celeron G1101 versus 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8335 — a 110% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8335 (base: 2.26 GHz vs 2.933 GHz). The Celeron G1101 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1101 scores 1,086 against the Core 2 Duo E8335's 1,094 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8335.

FeatureCeleron G1101Core 2 Duo E8335
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.27 GHz
0.93 GHz+244%
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
2.933 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
6 MB (total)+2300%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,086
1,094
Geekbench 6 Single
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1101 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G1101Core 2 Duo E8335
Socket
LGA1156
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16.38 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1101) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E8335). The Celeron G1101 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1101 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1101 rivals Pentium G6950.

FeatureCeleron G1101Core 2 Duo E8335
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron G1101 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E8335 debuted at $200. At current prices ($20 vs $50), the Celeron G1101 is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1101 delivers 54.3 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8335 — making the Celeron G1101 the 85.1% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G1101Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP
$50-75%
$200
Avg Price (30d)
$20-60%
$50
Performance per Dollar
54.3+148%
21.9
Release Date
2010
2009