
Celeron G1101 vs Core i7-620UM

Celeron G1101

Core i7-620UM
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1101 is positioned at rank 755 and the Core i7-620UM is on rank 1228, so the Celeron G1101 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1101
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-620UM
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G1101 | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($278) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G1101 | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1284%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($278) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1101 and Core i7-620UM

Celeron G1101
The Celeron G1101 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,086 points. Launch price was $85.

Core i7-620UM
The Core i7-620UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,091 points. Launch price was $278.
Processing Power
The Celeron G1101 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-620UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Celeron G1101 versus 2.13 GHz on the Core i7-620UM — a 155% clock advantage for the Core i7-620UM (base: 2.26 GHz vs 1.06 GHz). The Celeron G1101 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-620UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1101 scores 1,086 against the Core i7-620UM's 1,091 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-620UM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 350, a 33.3% lead for the Core i7-620UM that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 450 vs 700 (43.5% advantage for the Core i7-620UM). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1101 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620UM.
| Feature | Celeron G1101 | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 0.27 GHz | 2.13 GHz+689% |
| Base Clock | 2.26 GHz+113% | 1.06 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Clarkdale (2010−2011) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,086 | 1,091 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | 350+40% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 450 | 700+56% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G1101 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-620UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G1101 supports up to 16.38 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 68.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H55,3420 (Celeron G1101) and HM55,QM57 (Core i7-620UM).
| Feature | Celeron G1101 | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | BGA1288 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16.38 GB+105% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) (Celeron G1101) and Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i7-620UM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1101 targets Desktop, Core i7-620UM targets Ultra-Portable Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1101 rivals Pentium G6950; Core i7-620UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.
| Feature | Celeron G1101 | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Desktop | Ultra-Portable Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G1101 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Core i7-620UM debuted at $278.
| Feature | Celeron G1101 | Core i7-620UM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-82% | $278 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














