Celeron G1101 vs Phenom X3 8250e

Celeron G1101 vs Phenom X3 8250e Performance Spectrum

Celeron G1101

2 / 2

1,086

+0.2%

1,084

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1101 vs Phenom X3 8250e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1101 vs Phenom X3 8250e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1101

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Westmere), while Phenom X3 8250e needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Phenom X3 8250e.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Phenom X3 8250e mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom X3 8250e

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 73W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,084 vs 1,086).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1101 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G1101.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1101 better than Phenom X3 8250e?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom X3 8250e is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1101 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1101 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1101 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1101 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Phenom X3 8250e is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1101 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1101 vs Phenom X3 8250e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1101

The Celeron G1101 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,086 points. Launch price was $85.

Phenom X3 8250e

The Phenom X3 8250e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,084 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1101 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8250e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8250e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Celeron G1101 versus 1.9 GHz on the Phenom X3 8250e — a 150.2% clock advantage for the Phenom X3 8250e. The Celeron G1101 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom X3 8250e uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1101 scores 1,086 against the Phenom X3 8250e's 1,084 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G1101. Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G1101	Phenom X3 8250e
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock	0.27 GHz	1.9 GHz+604%
Base Clock	2.26 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Clarkdale (2010−2011)	Toliman (2008)
PassMark	1,086	1,084
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1101 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom X3 8250e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1101	Phenom X3 8250e
Socket	LGA1156	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	16.38 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1101) / not specified (Phenom X3 8250e). The Celeron G1101 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Phenom X3 8250e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1101 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1101 rivals Pentium G6950.