Celeron G1101
VS
Pentium B970

Celeron G1101 vs Pentium B970

Intel

Celeron G1101

2 Cores2 Thrd73 WWMax: 0.27 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium B970

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1101 is positioned at rank 755 and the Pentium B970 is on rank 1112, so the Celeron G1101 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1101

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14352%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13561%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9846%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2966%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2350%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2055%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1177%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1162%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1058%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1058%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1046%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1018%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1004%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
999%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
990%
#755
Celeron G1101
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
100%
#756
FX-8150
MSRP: $245|Avg: $50
100%
#757
Pentium G3240
MSRP: $89|Avg: $126
100%
#758
Core i5-3550S
MSRP: $205|Avg: $100
100%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
99%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
99%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
99%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
98%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#765
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#767
Core i5-4590T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $130
97%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
97%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium B970

#1100
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3357%
#1101
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3308%
#1102
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3037%
#1103
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3023%
#1104
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2995%
#1106
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2892%
#1107
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2773%
#1108
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2769%
#1109
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2695%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
100%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1114
Pentium T2370
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
99%
#1115
Pentium N3710
MSRP: $161|Avg: $50
99%
#1116
Core m3-7Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1117
Pentium 977
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
97%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
95%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
94%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium B970 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron G1101 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron G1101Pentium B970
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron G1101 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $20 (vs $39), it costs 49% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 94% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Pentium B970.
InsightCeleron G1101Pentium B970
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+94%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($39)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1101 and Pentium B970

Intel

Celeron G1101

The Celeron G1101 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,086 points. Launch price was $85.

Intel

Pentium B970

The Pentium B970 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $125.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1101 and Pentium B970 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Celeron G1101 versus 2.3 GHz on the Pentium B970 — a 158% clock advantage for the Pentium B970 (base: 2.26 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Celeron G1101 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium B970 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1101 scores 1,086 against the Pentium B970's 1,093 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium B970. Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron G1101Pentium B970
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.27 GHz
2.3 GHz+752%
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
2.3 GHz+2%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,086
1,093
Geekbench 6 Single
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1101 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium B970 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G1101Pentium B970
Socket
LGA1156
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16.38 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1101) / not specified (Pentium B970). The Celeron G1101 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Pentium B970 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1101 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1101 rivals Pentium G6950.

FeatureCeleron G1101Pentium B970
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron G1101 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Pentium B970 debuted at $125. At current prices ($20 vs $39), the Celeron G1101 is $19 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1101 delivers 54.3 pts/$ vs 28.0 pts/$ for the Pentium B970 — making the Celeron G1101 the 63.8% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G1101Pentium B970
MSRP
$50-60%
$125
Avg Price (30d)
$20-49%
$39
Performance per Dollar
54.3+94%
28.0
Release Date
2010
2012