Celeron G1101
VS
Celeron 2961Y

Celeron G1101 vs Celeron 2961Y

Intel

Celeron G1101

2 Cores2 Thrd73 WWMax: 0.27 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Celeron 2961Y

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1101 is positioned at rank 755 and the Celeron 2961Y is on rank 397, so the Celeron 2961Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1101

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14352%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13561%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9846%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2966%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2350%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2055%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1177%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1162%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1058%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1058%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1046%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1018%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1004%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
999%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
990%
#755
Celeron G1101
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
100%
#756
FX-8150
MSRP: $245|Avg: $50
100%
#757
Pentium G3240
MSRP: $89|Avg: $126
100%
#758
Core i5-3550S
MSRP: $205|Avg: $100
100%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
99%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
99%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
99%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
98%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#765
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#767
Core i5-4590T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $130
97%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
97%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2961Y

#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
98%
#385
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
541%
#386
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
533%
#387
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
489%
#388
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
487%
#389
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
483%
#391
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
466%
#392
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
447%
#393
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
446%
#394
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
434%
#397
Celeron 2961Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron 2961Y leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G1101 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron G1101Celeron 2961Y
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G1101Celeron 2961Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1101 and Celeron 2961Y

Intel

Celeron G1101

The Celeron G1101 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,086 points. Launch price was $85.

Intel

Celeron 2961Y

The Celeron 2961Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1101 and Celeron 2961Y share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Celeron G1101 versus 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 2961Y — a 121.2% clock advantage for the Celeron 2961Y (base: 2.26 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Celeron G1101 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 2961Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1101 scores 1,086 against the Celeron 2961Y's 1,085 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1101. Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron G1101Celeron 2961Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.27 GHz
1.1 GHz+307%
Base Clock
2.26 GHz+105%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,086
1,085
Geekbench 6 Single
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1101 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2961Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G1101 supports up to 16.38 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 2.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1101) vs 12 (Celeron 2961Y) — the Celeron G1101 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H55,3420 (Celeron G1101) and Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 2961Y).

FeatureCeleron G1101Celeron 2961Y
Socket
LGA1156
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16.38 GB+2%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) (Celeron G1101) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron 2961Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1101 targets Desktop, Celeron 2961Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1101 rivals Pentium G6950; Celeron 2961Y rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeatureCeleron G1101Celeron 2961Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop
Budget