Celeron G1101 vs Celeron 3215U
Celeron G1101
Celeron 3215U
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1101 is positioned at rank 755 and the Celeron 3215U is on rank 241, so the Celeron 3215U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1101
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3215U
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G1101 | Celeron 3215U |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G1101 | Celeron 3215U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1101 and Celeron 3215U
Celeron G1101
The Celeron G1101 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,086 points. Launch price was $85.
Celeron 3215U
The Celeron 3215U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,091 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G1101 and Celeron 3215U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Celeron G1101 versus 1.7 GHz on the Celeron 3215U — a 145.2% clock advantage for the Celeron 3215U (base: 2.26 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron G1101 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 3215U uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1101 scores 1,086 against the Celeron 3215U's 1,091 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron 3215U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 339, a 30.2% lead for the Celeron 3215U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1101 vs 2 MB on the Celeron 3215U.
| Feature | Celeron G1101 | Celeron 3215U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.27 GHz | 1.7 GHz+530% |
| Base Clock | 2.26 GHz+33% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Clarkdale (2010−2011) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 1,086 | 1,091 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | 339+36% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 450 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G1101 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 3215U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G1101 supports up to 16.38 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 2.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1101) vs 12 (Celeron 3215U) — the Celeron G1101 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H55,3420 (Celeron G1101) and Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 3215U).
| Feature | Celeron G1101 | Celeron 3215U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | FCBGA1168 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16.38 GB+2% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1101) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3215U). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) (Celeron G1101) and HD Graphics (Broadwell) (Celeron 3215U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1101 targets Desktop, Celeron 3215U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1101 rivals Pentium G6950; Celeron 3215U rivals Pentium 3825U.
| Feature | Celeron G1101 | Celeron 3215U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) | HD Graphics (Broadwell) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G1101 and Celeron 3215U
