Celeron G1101 vs E2-9010

Celeron G1101 vs E2-9010 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G1101

2 / 2

1,086

+1.2%

1,073

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1101 vs E2-9010 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1101 vs E2-9010: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1101

2010

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Westmere), while E2-9010 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike E2-9010.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while E2-9010 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌7200% higher power demand at 73W vs 1W.

E2-9010

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 73W, a 72W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,073 vs 1,086).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1101 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G1101.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-9010 better than Celeron G1101?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, E2-9010 is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1101 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1101 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-9010 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-9010 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G1101 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1156.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-9010 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1101 vs E2-9010 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1101

The Celeron G1101 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,086 points. Launch price was $85.

E2-9010

The E2-9010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,073 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1101 and E2-9010 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Celeron G1101 versus 2.2 GHz on the E2-9010 — a 156.3% clock advantage for the E2-9010 (base: 2.26 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G1101 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the E2-9010 uses Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1101 scores 1,086 against the E2-9010's 1,073 — a 1.2% lead for the Celeron G1101.

Feature	Celeron G1101	E2-9010
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.27 GHz	2.2 GHz+715%
Base Clock	2.26 GHz+13%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Clarkdale (2010−2011)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,086+1%	1,073
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1101 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E2-9010 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1101	E2-9010
Socket	LGA1156	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	16.38 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1101) / not specified (E2-9010). The Celeron G1101 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the E2-9010 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1101 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1101 rivals Pentium G6950.