Celeron G3900E vs Core i3-4330TE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900E vs Core i3-4330TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900E vs Core i3-4330TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900E

2016

Why buy it

✅+7.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.0 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).

Core i3-4330TE

2014

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (650 vs 699).
❌Lower PassMark (2,022 vs 2,034).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 19.0 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3900E better than Core i3-4330TE?

Yes. Celeron G3900E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3900E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3900E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3900E is the better buy right now. Celeron G3900E comes in $31 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 29.7% better value on MSRP (19.0 vs 14.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3900E vs Core i3-4330TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900E

The Celeron G3900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,034 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i3-4330TE

The Core i3-4330TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,022 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3900E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4330TE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G3900E versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4330TE — identical boost frequencies. The Celeron G3900E uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-4330TE uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900E scores 2,034 against the Core i3-4330TE's 2,022 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G3900E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 699 vs 650, a 7.3% lead for the Celeron G3900E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900E vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4330TE.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Core i3-4330TE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,034	2,022
Geekbench 6 Single	699+8%	650
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900E versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4330TE — the Celeron G3900E supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900E) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97,C226 (Core i3-4330TE).

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Core i3-4330TE
Socket	—	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+33%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3900E) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4330TE). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900E) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4330TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900E targets Budget, Core i3-4330TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900E rivals Pentium G4400; Core i3-4330TE rivals Embedded R-Series.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Core i3-4330TE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 510	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Budget	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3900E was priced at $107, while the Core i3-4330TE came in at $138. On launch pricing ($107 vs $138), Celeron G3900E was $31 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900E delivers 19.0 pts/$ vs 14.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-4330TE — making the Celeron G3900E the 25.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3900E	Core i3-4330TE
MSRP	$107-22%	$138
Performance per Dollar	19.0+29%	14.7
Release Date	2016	2014

Search Celeron G3900E on Amazon

Search Core i3-4330TE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.