Celeron G3930T vs Core i5-13400F
Celeron G3930T
Core i5-13400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron G3930T is positioned at rank #435 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3930T
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G3930T | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($39) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G3930T | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+168%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($39) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G3930T and Core i5-13400F
Celeron G3930T
The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 52.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G3930T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930T scores 2,023 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 170.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 704 vs 2,407, a 109.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,350 vs 11,408 (157.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930T vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 10 / 16+400% |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz+70% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+8% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+900% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 2,023 | 25,029+1137% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 704 | 2,407+242% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,350 | 11,408+745% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930T versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3930T) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930T) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 192 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Celeron G3930T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930T targets Desktop, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G3930T launched at $42 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. At current prices ($39 vs $180), the Celeron G3930T is $141 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930T delivers 51.9 pts/$ vs 139.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 91.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-79% | $196 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $39-78% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.9 | 139.1+168% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G3930T and Core i5-13400F
