
Celeron G3930T

Phenom II X4 905e
Celeron G3930T vs Phenom II X4 905e Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G3930T vs Phenom II X4 905e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G3930T vs Phenom II X4 905e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G3930T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 610, while Phenom II X4 905e needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Phenom II X4 905e.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 905e mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Phenom II X4 905e
2009Why buy it
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G3930T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,014 vs 2,023).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3930T.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G3930T better than Phenom II X4 905e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3930T vs Phenom II X4 905e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930T
The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.

Phenom II X4 905e
The Phenom II X4 905e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,014 points. Launch price was $212.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 905e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 905e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T versus 2.5 GHz on the Phenom II X4 905e — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930T (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G3930T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X4 905e uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930T scores 2,023 against the Phenom II X4 905e's 2,014 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G3930T. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930T vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 905e.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Phenom II X4 905e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+8% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+8% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Deneb (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,023 | 2,014 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 704 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,350 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 905e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Phenom II X4 905e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3930T) / not specified (Phenom II X4 905e). The Celeron G3930T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Phenom II X4 905e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Phenom II X4 905e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















