
Celeron G3930T

Ryzen 7 5800X
Celeron G3930T vs Ryzen 7 5800X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G3930T vs Ryzen 7 5800X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G3930T vs Ryzen 7 5800X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G3930T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $407 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 610, while Ryzen 7 5800X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Ryzen 7 5800X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,023 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.2 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +394.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Delivers 28.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 48.2 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌969% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$42 MSRP
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3930T.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Celeron G3930T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3930T vs Ryzen 7 5800X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930T
The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.


Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 54.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Celeron G3930T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930T scores 2,023 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 172.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930T vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 4.7 GHz+74% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 32 MB+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 2,023 | 27,712+1270% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 704 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,350 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the Ryzen 7 5800X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3930T) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930T) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3930T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). The Celeron G3930T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Ryzen 7 5800X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930T targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G3930T was priced at $42, while the Ryzen 7 5800X came in at $449. On launch pricing ($42 vs $449), Celeron G3930T was $407 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930T delivers 48.2 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 24.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3930T | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-91% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.2 | 61.7+28% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














