Celeron G4950
VS
A6-7310

Celeron G4950 vs A6-7310

Intel

Celeron G4950

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
VS
AMD

A6-7310

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4950

#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
108%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
107%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
105%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
105%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
104%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
104%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
104%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
104%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
103%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
103%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
103%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
102%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
102%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
101%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
100%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
100%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
100%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
99%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
96%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
96%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
91%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
90%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
89%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
86%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
84%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
83%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
80%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
80%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
77%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
76%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
75%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-7310

#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
99%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
98%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
97%
#490
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
655%
#491
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
645%
#492
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
592%
#493
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
589%
#494
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
584%
#496
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
564%
#497
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
541%
#498
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
540%
#499
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
525%
#502
A6-7310
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G4950 (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G4950A6-7310
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($63)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo-L (2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A6-7310 (2015) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3L-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G4950A6-7310
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($63)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G4950 and A6-7310

Intel

Celeron G4950

The Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,714 points. Launch price was $52.

AMD

A6-7310

The A6-7310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,689 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Celeron G4950 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A6-7310 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A6-7310 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Celeron G4950 versus 2.4 GHz on the A6-7310 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G4950 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G4950 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the A6-7310 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4950 scores 2,714 against the A6-7310's 2,689 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron G4950.

FeatureCeleron G4950A6-7310
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+38%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+65%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
2048 kB+300%
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Carrizo-L (2015)
PassMark
2,714
2,689
Geekbench 6 Single
672
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,229
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4950 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A6-7310 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4950 versus 1600 on the A6-7310 — the A6-7310 supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4950 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron G4950) vs 1 (A6-7310). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4950) and FT3b,FP4 (A6-7310).

FeatureCeleron G4950A6-7310
Socket
LGA1151
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
1600+39900%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+419430300%
16
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4950) vs true (A6-7310). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4950) and Radeon R4 Graphics (A6-7310) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4950 rivals Pentium G5420; A6-7310 rivals Pentium N3700.

FeatureCeleron G4950A6-7310
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Radeon R4 Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Budget