
Celeron G5905

Core i5-10400F
Celeron G5905 vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G5905 vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G5905 vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G5905
2020Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,242 vs 5,783).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +186.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G5905.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Celeron G5905 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5905 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Celeron G5905?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G5905 vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5905
The Celeron G5905 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,760 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Celeron G5905 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5905 scores 2,760 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 130.1% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 724 vs 1,454, a 67% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,242 vs 5,783 (129.3% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5905 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Celeron G5905 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | — | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+21% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | — | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,760 | 13,029+372% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 724 | 1,454+101% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,242 | 5,783+366% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5905) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Celeron G5905 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5905) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Celeron G5905 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5905 targets Budget, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron G5905 rivals Pentium Gold G6405; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Celeron G5905 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













