Celeron J1850 vs Atom C3338
Celeron J1850
Atom C3338
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1850 is positioned at rank 110 and the Atom C3338 is on rank 543, so the Celeron J1850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1850
Performance Per Dollar Atom C3338
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron J1850 | Atom C3338 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($82) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron J1850 | Atom C3338 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($82) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1850 and Atom C3338
Celeron J1850
The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.
Atom C3338
The Atom C3338 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 February 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $27.
Processing Power
The Celeron J1850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3338 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J1850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 versus 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3338 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Atom C3338 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Celeron J1850 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Atom C3338 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1850 scores 1,035 against the Atom C3338's 1,028 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron J1850. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850 vs 4 MB on the Atom C3338.
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Atom C3338 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+33% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| PassMark | 1,035 | 1,028 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 450 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J1850 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom C3338 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1850 versus DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3338 — the Atom C3338 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3338 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron J1850) vs 1 (Atom C3338). PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J1850) vs 10 (Atom C3338) — the Atom C3338 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1850) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3338).
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Atom C3338 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1310 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333 | DDR4-1866+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 10+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J1850) / not specified (Atom C3338). The Celeron J1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Atom C3338 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900.
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Atom C3338 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Low Power | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron J1850 and Atom C3338
