Celeron J3455E vs Atom x7211RE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211RE

#162

Core Ultra 7 256V

MSRP: $450|Avg: $350

99%

#503

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

670%

#504

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

661%

#505

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

606%

#506

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

604%

#507

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

598%

#509

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

578%

#510

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

554%

#511

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

553%

#512

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

538%

#515

Atom x7211RE

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom x7211RE leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron J3455E is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Celeron J3455E	Atom x7211RE
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)	✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Celeron J3455E	Atom x7211RE
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron J3455E Benchmark Check

Atom x7211RE Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J3455E and Atom x7211RE

Celeron J3455E

The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.

Atom x7211RE

The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J3455E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom x7211RE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J3455E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E versus 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE — a 32.7% clock advantage for the Atom x7211RE (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Atom x7211RE is built on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron J3455E scores 2,193 against the Atom x7211RE's 2,188 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron J3455E. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron J3455E vs 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211RE.

Feature	Celeron J3455E	Atom x7211RE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3.2 GHz+39%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz+50%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	6 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	—	Amston Lake (2024−2025)
PassMark	2,193	2,188
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	850	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J3455E versus LPDDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211RE — the Atom x7211RE supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x7211RE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron J3455E) vs 1 (Atom x7211RE). PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J3455E) vs 8 (Atom x7211RE) — the Atom x7211RE offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3455E) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211RE).

Feature	Celeron J3455E	Atom x7211RE
Socket	—	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	LPDDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	❌	✅
PCIe Lanes	6	8+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J3455E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 500 (Celeron J3455E) and UHD Graphics (16 EU) (Atom x7211RE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455E targets Low Power, Atom x7211RE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205.