Celeron J4105 vs Core i7-5550U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4105 vs Core i7-5550U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4105 vs Core i7-5550U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4105

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 512W, a 502W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Core i7-5550U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-5550U

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,780 vs 2,820).
❌5020% higher power demand at 512W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4105 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J4105 better than Core i7-5550U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-5550U is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4105 pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4105 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J4105 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron J4105 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4105 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J4105 vs Core i7-5550U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4105

The Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,820 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i7-5550U

The Core i7-5550U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,780 points. Launch price was $426.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J4105 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-5550U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4105 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4105 versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-5550U — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-5550U (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron J4105 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-5550U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4105 scores 2,820 against the Core i7-5550U's 2,780 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron J4105. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4105 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-5550U.

Feature	Celeron J4105	Core i7-5550U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark	2,820+1%	2,780

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-5550U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4105	Core i7-5550U
Socket	FCBGA1090	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4105) / not specified (Core i7-5550U). The Celeron J4105 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Core i7-5550U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4105 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.