Celeron M 560 vs Core i5-580M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 560 vs Core i5-580M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 560 vs Core i5-580M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 560

2008

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Core i5-580M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-580M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-580M

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics, while Celeron M 560 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,983 vs 2,008).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 560 better than Core i5-580M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-580M is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 560 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 560 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-580M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-580M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M 560 vs Core i5-580M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 560

The Celeron M 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,008 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-580M

The Core i5-580M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,983 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 560 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-580M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-580M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Celeron M 560 versus 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-580M — a 44% clock advantage for the Core i5-580M. The Celeron M 560 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-580M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 560 scores 2,008 against the Core i5-580M's 1,983 — a 1.3% lead for the Celeron M 560.

Feature	Celeron M 560	Core i5-580M
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.13 GHz	3.33 GHz+56%
Base Clock	—	2.66 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,008+1%	1,983
Geekbench 6 Single	—	445

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 560 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-580M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 667 on the Celeron M 560 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i5-580M — the Core i5-580M supports 59.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-580M supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 560) vs 16 (Core i5-580M) — the Core i5-580M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL960,GM965 (Celeron M 560) and HM55,PM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i5-580M).

Feature	Celeron M 560	Core i5-580M
Socket	PGA478	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	667	DDR3-1066+60%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Celeron M 560) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-580M). The Core i5-580M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Celeron M 560 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-580M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron M 560 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+; Core i5-580M rivals Phenom II X2 N660.