Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G2140

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G2140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G2140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 900

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 20.9 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 55W, a 54W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G2140 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Pentium G2140.

Pentium G2140

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Celeron M 900 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Celeron M 900.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,092 vs 2,101).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌5400% higher power demand at 55W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 900 better than Pentium G2140?

Yes. Celeron M 900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron M 900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 43 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 900 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 900 comes in $14 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 16.8% better value on MSRP (24.4 vs 20.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G2140 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G2140 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 900

The Celeron M 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,101 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium G2140

The Pentium G2140 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,092 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 900 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium G2140 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G2140 has 1 more core. The Celeron M 900 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron M 900 scores 2,101 against the Pentium G2140's 2,092 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron M 900.

Feature	Celeron M 900	Pentium G2140
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	—
PassMark	2,101	2,092
Geekbench 6 Single	—	550
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	920

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 900 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G2140 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron M 900	Pentium G2140
Socket	PGA478	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron M 900) / VT-x (Pentium G2140). The Pentium G2140 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Celeron M 900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G2140 targets Legacy Desktop.

Feature	Celeron M 900	Pentium G2140
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Legacy Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron M 900 was priced at $86, while the Pentium G2140 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($86 vs $100), Celeron M 900 was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 900 delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 20.9 pts/$ for the Pentium G2140 — making the Celeron M 900 the 15.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron M 900	Pentium G2140
MSRP	$86-14%	$100
Performance per Dollar	24.4+17%	20.9
Release Date	2009	2013

Search Celeron M 900 on Amazon

Search Pentium G2140 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.