
Celeron N2807 vs Core i5-10400F

Celeron N2807

Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron N2807 is positioned at rank #51 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2807
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron N2807 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($60) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron N2807 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+266%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($60) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2807 and Core i5-10400F

Celeron N2807
The Celeron N2807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Celeron N2807 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2807 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 66.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 1.58 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Celeron N2807 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2807 scores 2,093 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 144.6% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 1,454, a 155.9% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 320 vs 5,783 (179% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2807 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Celeron N2807 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2.16 GHz | 4.3 GHz+99% |
| Base Clock | 1.58 GHz | 2.9 GHz+84% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,093 | 13,029+523% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | 1,454+708% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 320 | 5,783+1707% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N2807 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron N2807 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron N2807) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2807) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2807) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Celeron N2807 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333 | DDR4-2666+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 16+300% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron N2807) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Celeron N2807 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2807 targets Netbook, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron N2807 rivals AMD E1-6010; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Celeron N2807 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Netbook | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Celeron N2807 launched at $107 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($60 vs $102), the Celeron N2807 is $42 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N2807 delivers 34.9 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 114.2% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron N2807 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-33% | $160 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-41% | $102 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.9 | 127.7+266% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














