Celeron N2807 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU

GPU

Celeron N2807

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron N2807 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Celeron N2807

2 / 2

2,093

0.0%

22,430

+971.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2807 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2807 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2807

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $222 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,093 vs 22,430).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +397.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 248.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
207.5% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$107 MSRP
❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2807 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Celeron N2807?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 397.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 971.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 397.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 971.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in 207.5% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 397.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 248.5% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 19.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2807 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2807

The Celeron N2807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $107.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2807 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2807 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 68.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 1.58 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron N2807 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2807 scores 2,093 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 165.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2807 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Celeron N2807	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	8 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz	4.4 GHz+104%
Base Clock	1.58 GHz	3.6 GHz+128%
L3 Cache	0 kB	32 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	22 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-68%
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	2,093	22,430+972%
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	320	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2807 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron N2807 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron N2807) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2807) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2807) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Celeron N2807	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	FCBGA1170	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	DDR4-3200+140%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	128 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	24+500%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron N2807) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Celeron N2807 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2807 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Celeron N2807 rivals AMD E1-6010.

Feature	Celeron N2807	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Netbook	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron N2807 was priced at $107, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($107 vs $329), Celeron N2807 was $222 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N2807 delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 110.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron N2807	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$107-67%	$329
Performance per Dollar	19.6	68.2+248%
Release Date	2014	2019

Search Celeron N2807 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.