Celeron N3010 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

CPU

GPU

Celeron N3010

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.24 GHz2016

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 9 5900X

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Buy on Amazon

Celeron N3010 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum

Celeron N3010

2 / 2

735

0.0%

38,955

+5200.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3010 vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3010 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3010

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $442 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Draws 4W instead of 105W, a 101W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (735 vs 38,955).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +1439.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 933.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 6.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
413.1% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$107 MSRP
❌2525% higher power demand at 105W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3010 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Celeron N3010?

Yes. Ryzen 9 5900X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1439.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5200% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1439.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900X is the stronger fit. You are getting 5200% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 9 5900X comes in 413.1% more expensive on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1439.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 933.0% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 6.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 5900X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N3010 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3010

The Celeron N3010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 735 points. Launch price was $107.

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N3010 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.24 GHz on the Celeron N3010 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 72.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 1.04 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Celeron N3010 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3010 scores 735 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 192.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3010 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

Feature	Celeron N3010	Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	12 / 24+500%
Boost Clock	2.24 GHz	4.8 GHz+114%
Base Clock	1.04 GHz	3.7 GHz+256%
L3 Cache	0 kB	64 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture	Airmont (2016)	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	735	38,955+5200%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	21,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,888

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3010 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Celeron N3010 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N3010) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Braswell (Celeron N3010) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

Feature	Celeron N3010	Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket	FCBGA1170	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR4-3200+100%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	128 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	24+500%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Celeron N3010) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Celeron N3010 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3010 targets Budget Mobile, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

Feature	Celeron N3010	Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 400	—
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	AMD-V
Target Use	Budget Mobile	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron N3010 was priced at $107, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($107 vs $549), Celeron N3010 was $442 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N3010 delivers 6.9 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 164.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron N3010	Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP	$107-81%	$549
Performance per Dollar	6.9	71.0+929%
Release Date	2016	2020

Search Celeron N3010 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 9 5900X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.