
Celeron N3350

Pentium B980
Celeron N3350 vs Pentium B980 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron N3350 vs Pentium B980 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron N3350 vs Pentium B980: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron N3350
2016Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $18 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.4 vs 8.8 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Pentium B980
2012Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,101 vs 1,112).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($125 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron N3350 better than Pentium B980?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N3350 vs Pentium B980 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3350
The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

Pentium B980
The Pentium B980 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,101 points. Launch price was $125.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron N3350 and Pentium B980 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium B980 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron N3350 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium B980 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3350 scores 1,112 against the Pentium B980's 1,101 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N3350. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3350 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium B980.
| Feature | Celeron N3350 | Pentium B980 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz+118% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 256K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,112 | 1,101 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 450 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N3350 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium B980 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron N3350 | Pentium B980 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1296 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 6 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350) / not specified (Pentium B980). The Celeron N3350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Pentium B980 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.
| Feature | Celeron N3350 | Pentium B980 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 500 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Entry Level Laptop/NUC | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron N3350 was priced at $107, while the Pentium B980 came in at $125. On launch pricing ($107 vs $125), Celeron N3350 was $18 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N3350 delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 8.8 pts/$ for the Pentium B980 — making the Celeron N3350 the 16.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron N3350 | Pentium B980 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-14% | $125 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4+18% | 8.8 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














