Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i5-4210M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i5-4210M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i5-4210M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo P8800

2009

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 512W, a 509W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4210M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-4210M

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core 2 Duo P8800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,899 vs 2,932).
❌16966.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo P8800 better than Core i5-4210M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-4210M is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P8800 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P8800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo P8800 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo P8800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4210M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core i5-4210M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo P8800

The Core 2 Duo P8800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,932 points. Launch price was $241.

Core i5-4210M

The Core i5-4210M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,899 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo P8800 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4210M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8800 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-4210M — a 18.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-4210M (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P8800 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-4210M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P8800 scores 2,932 against the Core i5-4210M's 2,899 — a 1.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8800. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8800 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4210M.

Feature	Core 2 Duo P8800	Core i5-4210M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.66 GHz	3.2 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.66 GHz+2%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB L2 Cache	3 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	512 kB
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,932+1%	2,899
Geekbench 6 Single	—	959

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo P8800 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-4210M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Duo P8800	Core i5-4210M
Socket	PGA478	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo P8800) / VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4210M). The Core i5-4210M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4210M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4210M rivals A10-5750M.