
Core 2 Duo SU7300

Pentium G860
Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G860 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G860 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G860: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo SU7300
2009Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 256W, a 253W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 17.3 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium G860 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium G860
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $203 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 233.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.3 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics, while Core 2 Duo SU7300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,485 vs 1,496).
- ❌8433.3% higher power demand at 256W vs 3W.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G860 better than Core 2 Duo SU7300?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G860 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo SU7300
The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium G860
The Pentium G860 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Pentium G860 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G860 — a 79.1% clock advantage for the Pentium G860 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G860 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 scores 1,496 against the Pentium G860's 1,485 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo SU7300. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G860.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SU7300 | Pentium G860 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3 GHz+131% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3 GHz+131% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 256K (per core)+8433% |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,496 | 1,485 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 188 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 338 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G860 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G860 — the Pentium G860 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G860 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) vs 16 (Pentium G860) — the Pentium G860 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SU7300 | Pentium G860 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1333+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Pentium G860 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop, Pentium G860 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SU7300 | Pentium G860 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 was priced at $289, while the Pentium G860 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($289 vs $86), Pentium G860 was $203 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo SU7300 delivers 5.2 pts/$ vs 17.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G860 — making the Pentium G860 the 107.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SU7300 | Pentium G860 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | $86-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2 | 17.3+233% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














