Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G860

Intel

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G860

2 Cores2 Thrd256 WWMax: 3 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G860 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G860 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G860: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2009

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 3W instead of 256W, a 253W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 17.3 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Pentium G860 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Pentium G860

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $203 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
  • Delivers 233.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.3 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics, while Core 2 Duo SU7300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,485 vs 1,496).
  • 8433.3% higher power demand at 256W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G860 better than Core 2 Duo SU7300?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G860 is ahead with a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SU7300 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo SU7300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium G860 is the better buy right now. Pentium G860 comes in $203 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo SU7300 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 233.6% better value on MSRP (17.3 vs 5.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G860 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium G860 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 2 Duo SU7300

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Pentium G860

The Pentium G860 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Pentium G860 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G860 — a 79.1% clock advantage for the Pentium G860 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G860 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 scores 1,496 against the Pentium G860's 1,485 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo SU7300. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G860.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SU7300Pentium G860
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
3 GHz+131%
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
3 GHz+131%
L3 Cache
3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
3 MB
256K (per core)+8433%
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,496
1,485
Geekbench 6 Single
188
Geekbench 6 Multi
338
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G860 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G860 — the Pentium G860 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G860 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) vs 16 (Pentium G860) — the Pentium G860 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SU7300Pentium G860
Socket
BGA956
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Pentium G860 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop, Pentium G860 targets Desktop.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SU7300Pentium G860
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 was priced at $289, while the Pentium G860 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($289 vs $86), Pentium G860 was $203 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo SU7300 delivers 5.2 pts/$ vs 17.3 pts/$ for the Pentium G860 — making the Pentium G860 the 107.7% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo SU7300Pentium G860
MSRP
$289
$86-70%
Performance per Dollar
5.2
17.3+233%
Release Date
2009
2011

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.