Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs Celeron G3930TE
Core 2 Quad Q9450
Celeron G3930TE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is positioned at rank 1049 and the Celeron G3930TE is on rank 403, so the Celeron G3930TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9450
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3930TE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Celeron G3930TE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($29) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Celeron G3930TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+92%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($29) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Celeron G3930TE
Core 2 Quad Q9450
The Core 2 Quad Q9450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,208 points. Launch price was $249.
Celeron G3930TE
The Celeron G3930TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,218 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Quad Q9450 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3930TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9450 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9450 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930TE — a 1.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930TE (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G3930TE uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9450 scores 2,208 against the Celeron G3930TE's 2,218 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G3930TE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q9450 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3930TE.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Celeron G3930TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.67 GHz | 2.7 GHz+1% |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz | 2.7 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB (total)+2300% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,208 | 2,218 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 548 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 948 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q9450 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G3930TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Celeron G3930TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Quad Q9450) / VT-x (Celeron G3930TE). The Celeron G3930TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Core 2 Quad Q9450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930TE rivals Pentium G4560T.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Celeron G3930TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Quad Q9450 launched at $316 MSRP, while the Celeron G3930TE debuted at $42. At current prices ($15 vs $29), the Core 2 Quad Q9450 is $14 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q9450 delivers 147.2 pts/$ vs 76.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G3930TE — making the Core 2 Quad Q9450 the 63.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Celeron G3930TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $316 | $42-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-48% | $29 |
| Performance per Dollar | 147.2+92% | 76.5 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Quad Q9450 and Celeron G3930TE
