
Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Celeron J3455E

Core 2 Quad Q9505

Celeron J3455E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is positioned at rank #993 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9505
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Celeron J3455E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Celeron J3455E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Celeron J3455E

Core 2 Quad Q9505
The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $249.

Celeron J3455E
The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Celeron J3455E share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.83 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E — a 93.9% clock advantage for the Celeron J3455E (base: 2.83 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is built on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9505 scores 2,176 against the Celeron J3455E's 2,193 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron J3455E. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs 2 MB on the Celeron J3455E.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Celeron J3455E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 0.83 GHz | 2.3 GHz+177% |
| Base Clock | 2.83 GHz+89% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache+200% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total) | — |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | — |
| PassMark | 2,176 | 2,193 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 450 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 850 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J3455E — the Celeron J3455E supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Quad Q9505 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Quad Q9505) vs 6 (Celeron J3455E) — the Celeron J3455E offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Celeron J3455E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 6 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron J3455E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Core 2 Quad Q9505 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q9505 targets Desktop, Celeron J3455E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Celeron J3455E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 500 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Desktop | Low Power |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











