Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Core 2 Duo P7370
Core 2 Quad Q9505
Core 2 Duo P7370
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is positioned at rank 993 and the Core 2 Duo P7370 is on rank 512, so the Core 2 Duo P7370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9505
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P7370
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Core 2 Duo P7370 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Core 2 Duo P7370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core 2 Duo P7370
Core 2 Quad Q9505
The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $249.
Core 2 Duo P7370
The Core 2 Duo P7370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,191 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Quad Q9505 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P7370 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9505 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.83 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7370 — a 82.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P7370 (base: 2.83 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9505 scores 2,176 against the Core 2 Duo P7370's 2,191 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo P7370. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7370.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Core 2 Duo P7370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.83 GHz | 2 GHz+141% |
| Base Clock | 2.83 GHz+42% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache+100% | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total)+100% | 3 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,176 | 2,191 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo P7370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Core 2 Quad Q9505 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Quad Q9505) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo P7370) — the Core 2 Duo P7370 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Core 2 Duo P7370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q9505) vs false (Core 2 Duo P7370). Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q9505 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 2 Quad Q9505 | Core 2 Duo P7370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | false |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core 2 Duo P7370
