
Core 3 N355

Core i5-13400F
Core 3 N355 vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 3 N355 vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 3 N355 vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 3 N355
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,502 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $104 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 264.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 35.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core 3 N355?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 3 N355 vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 3 N355
The Core 3 N355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,502 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Core 3 N355 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N355 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 3 N355 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 N355 scores 10,502 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 81.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N355 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core 3 N355 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 10 / 16+25% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz+2400% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+233% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Twin Lake (2024−2025) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 10,502 | 25,029+138% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 3 N355 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 3 N355 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 3 N355) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core 3 N355 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 3 N355 was priced at $300, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($300 vs $196), Core i5-13400F was $104 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 N355 delivers 35.0 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 113.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core 3 N355 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $196-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.0 | 127.7+265% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














