
Core i3-10105F

Core i5-10400F
Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-10105F
2021Why buy it
- β Costs $63 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- β Delivers 12.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.9 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($97 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (4,503 vs 5,783).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $97 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i3-10105F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10105F vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-10105F
The Core i3-10105F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,912 points. Launch price was $97.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Core i3-10105F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105F versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F β a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105F (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-10105F uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020β2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105F scores 8,912 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 β a 37.5% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,461 vs 1,454, a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-10105F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 4,503 vs 5,783 (24.9% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105F vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Core i3-10105F | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+2% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+28% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-R (2021) | Comet Lake (2020β2025) |
| PassMark | 8,912 | 13,029+46% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,461 | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,503 | 5,783+28% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i3-10105F) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Core i3-10105F | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i3-10105F | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-10105F was priced at $97, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($97 vs $160), Core i3-10105F was $63 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105F delivers 91.9 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F β making the Core i3-10105F the 12.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-10105F | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $97-39% | $160 |
| Performance per Dollar | 91.9+13% | 81.4 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














