Core i3-4010Y vs Processor N50

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4010Y vs Processor N50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4010Y vs Processor N50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4010Y

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4200, while Processor N50 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1168, while Processor N50 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Processor N50

2023

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1168 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4010Y across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,339 vs 1,358).
❌Launch MSRP is still $128 MSRP, while Core i3-4010Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4010Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4010Y better than Processor N50?

Yes. Core i3-4010Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4010Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4010Y is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i3-4010Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Processor N50 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor N50 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1168, and 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-4010Y vs Processor N50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4010Y

The Core i3-4010Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,358 points. Launch price was $297.

Processor N50

The Processor N50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4010Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Processor N50's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-4010Y versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor N50 — a 89.4% clock advantage for the Processor N50 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Core i3-4010Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Processor N50 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4010Y scores 1,358 against the Processor N50's 1,339 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i3-4010Y. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010Y vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N50.

Feature	Core i3-4010Y	Processor N50
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+162%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz+30%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (total)
Process	22 nm	10 nm-55%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Alder Lake-N (2023)
PassMark	1,358+1%	1,339

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4010Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N50 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4010Y	Processor N50
Socket	FCBGA1168	FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010Y) / not specified (Processor N50). The Core i3-4010Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4200), while the Processor N50 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4010Y targets Mobile.