
Core i3-4010Y

Ryzen 7 5700X
Core i3-4010Y vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4010Y vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4010Y vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4010Y
2013Why buy it
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4200, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,358 vs 26,609).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 32 MB).
- β687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +632.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +966.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 3 MB).
- β Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
- β 100% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i3-4010Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i3-4010Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Core i3-4010Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4010Y vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4010Y
The Core i3-4010Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,358 points. Launch price was $297.


Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4010Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 5700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-4010Y versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X β a 111.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i3-4010Y uses the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4010Y scores 1,358 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 β a 180.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010Y vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Core i3-4010Y | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 1.3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+254% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+162% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+967% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 7 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013β2015) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 1,358 | 26,609+1859% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4010Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-4010Y versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X β the Ryzen 7 5700X supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-4010Y) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) β the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i3-4010Y | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 24+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010Y) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). The Core i3-4010Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4200), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4010Y targets Mobile, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Core i3-4010Y | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4200 | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mobile | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













