
Core i3-4330TE

Core i5-13400F
Core i3-4330TE vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4330TE vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4330TE vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4330TE
2014Why buy it
- β Costs $58 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- β Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,022 vs 25,029).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- βOlder platform position on LGA1150, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +330.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Delivers 771.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1150 and older memory support.
- β 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β42% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$138 MSRP
- β85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i3-4330TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i3-4330TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4330TE vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4330TE
The Core i3-4330TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,022 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4330TE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads β the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4330TE versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F β a 62.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-4330TE uses the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4330TE scores 2,022 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 β a 170.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 650 vs 2,407, a 114.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4330TE vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core i3-4330TE | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 10 / 16+400% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+92% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013β2015) | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) |
| PassMark | 2,022 | 25,029+1138% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 650 | 2,407+270% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4330TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4330TE versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F β the Core i5-13400F supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-4330TE) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) β the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97,C226 (Core i3-4330TE) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Core i3-4330TE | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+200% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 192 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4330TE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Core i3-4330TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4330TE targets Embedded, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i3-4330TE rivals Embedded R-Series; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i3-4330TE | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | β |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Embedded | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4330TE was priced at $138, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($138 vs $196), Core i3-4330TE was $58 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4330TE delivers 14.7 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F β making the Core i5-13400F the 158.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4330TE | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-30% | $196 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 127.7+769% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














