Core i3-4330TE vs Pentium Dual Core T3400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4330TE vs Pentium Dual Core T3400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4330TE vs Pentium Dual Core T3400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4330TE

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Pentium Dual Core T3400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,022 vs 2,026).
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Pentium Dual Core T3400 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Pentium Dual Core T3400

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4330TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4330TE better than Pentium Dual Core T3400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-4330TE is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T3400 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual Core T3400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4330TE is the better buy right now. Core i3-4330TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium Dual Core T3400 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4330TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4330TE vs Pentium Dual Core T3400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4330TE

The Core i3-4330TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,022 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium Dual Core T3400

The Pentium Dual Core T3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.16 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,026 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4330TE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium Dual Core T3400's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4330TE versus 2.16 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3400 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-4330TE. The Core i3-4330TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T3400 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4330TE scores 2,022 against the Pentium Dual Core T3400's 2,026 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T3400.

Feature	Core i3-4330TE	Pentium Dual Core T3400
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+11%	2.16 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	2,022	2,026
Geekbench 6 Single	650	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4330TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T3400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-4330TE	Pentium Dual Core T3400
Socket	LGA1150	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4330TE) / not specified (Pentium Dual Core T3400). The Core i3-4330TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Pentium Dual Core T3400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4330TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-4330TE rivals Embedded R-Series.

Feature	Core i3-4330TE	Pentium Dual Core T3400
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, EPT	—
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4330TE was priced at $138, while the Pentium Dual Core T3400 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($138 vs $0), Pentium Dual Core T3400 was $138 cheaper.

Feature	Core i3-4330TE	Pentium Dual Core T3400
MSRP	$138	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	14.7	—
Release Date	2014	2008

Search Core i3-4330TE on Amazon

Search Pentium Dual Core T3400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.