
Core i3-4330TE vs Xeon E5410

Core i3-4330TE

Xeon E5410
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4330TE is positioned at rank 903 and the Xeon E5410 is on rank 918, so the Core i3-4330TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4330TE
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5410
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-4330TE | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-4330TE | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+33%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4330TE and Xeon E5410

Core i3-4330TE
The Core i3-4330TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,022 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5410
The Xeon E5410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,032 points. Launch price was $256.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4330TE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5410 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4330TE versus 0.33 GHz on the Xeon E5410 — a 151.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-4330TE (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Core i3-4330TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5410 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4330TE scores 2,022 against the Xeon E5410's 2,032 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5410. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4330TE vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5410.
| Feature | Core i3-4330TE | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+627% | 0.33 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+3% | 2.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12 MB L2 Cache+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 6 MB (total)+2300% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,022 | 2,032 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 650 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4330TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5410 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4330TE versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon E5410 — the Core i3-4330TE supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-4330TE) vs 0 (Xeon E5410) — the Core i3-4330TE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i3-4330TE | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+50% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4330TE) vs VT-x (Xeon E5410). The Core i3-4330TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E5410 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4330TE targets Embedded, Xeon E5410 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i3-4330TE rivals Embedded R-Series.
| Feature | Core i3-4330TE | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | Embedded | Server |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-4330TE launched at $138 MSRP, while the Xeon E5410 debuted at $256. At current prices ($15 vs $20), the Core i3-4330TE is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4330TE delivers 134.8 pts/$ vs 101.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5410 — making the Core i3-4330TE the 28.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4330TE | Xeon E5410 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-46% | $256 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 134.8+33% | 101.6 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











