
Core i3-4330TE

Core M-5Y51
Core i3-4330TE vs Core M-5Y51 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4330TE vs Core M-5Y51 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4330TE vs Core M-5Y51: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4330TE
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $143 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 102.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core M-5Y51 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,022 vs 2,030).
Core M-5Y51
2014Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4330TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core M-5Y51 better than Core i3-4330TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4330TE vs Core M-5Y51 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4330TE
The Core i3-4330TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,022 points. Launch price was $69.

Core M-5Y51
The Core M-5Y51 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,030 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-4330TE and Core M-5Y51 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4330TE versus 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y51 — a 8% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y51 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i3-4330TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core M-5Y51 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4330TE scores 2,022 against the Core M-5Y51's 2,030 — a 0.4% lead for the Core M-5Y51. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-4330TE | Core M-5Y51 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+118% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Broadwell-Y (2014) |
| PassMark | 2,022 | 2,030 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 650 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4330TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core M-5Y51 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-4330TE | Core M-5Y51 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | FCBGA1234 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4330TE) / not specified (Core M-5Y51). The Core i3-4330TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core M-5Y51 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4330TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-4330TE rivals Embedded R-Series.
| Feature | Core i3-4330TE | Core M-5Y51 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Embedded | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4330TE was priced at $138, while the Core M-5Y51 came in at $281. On launch pricing ($138 vs $281), Core i3-4330TE was $143 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4330TE delivers 14.7 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y51 — making the Core i3-4330TE the 67.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4330TE | Core M-5Y51 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-51% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7+104% | 7.2 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














