Core i3-4330TE vs Phenom II X4 810

Intel

Core i3-4330TE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 810

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-4330TE vs Phenom II X4 810 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4330TE vs Phenom II X4 810 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4330TE vs Phenom II X4 810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4330TE

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $37 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $175 MSRP).
  • Delivers 25.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $175 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Phenom II X4 810 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,022 vs 2,036).

Phenom II X4 810

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($175 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
    • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4330TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Phenom II X4 810 better than Core i3-4330TE?
    Yes. Phenom II X4 810 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X4 810 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 810 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Phenom II X4 810 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Phenom II X4 810 comes in 26.8% more expensive on MSRP at $175 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4330TE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 25.9% better value on paper (14.7 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i3-4330TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core i3-4330TE vs Phenom II X4 810 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i3-4330TE

    The Core i3-4330TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,022 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Phenom II X4 810

    The Phenom II X4 810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,036 points. Launch price was $116.

    Processing Power

    The Core i3-4330TE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X4 810 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 810 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4330TE versus 2.6 GHz on the Phenom II X4 810 — a 8% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 810 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-4330TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X4 810 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4330TE scores 2,022 against the Phenom II X4 810's 2,036 — a 0.7% lead for the Phenom II X4 810. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureCore i3-4330TEPhenom II X4 810
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4
    4 / 4+100%
    Boost Clock
    2.4 GHz
    2.6 GHz+8%
    Base Clock
    2.4 GHz
    2.6 GHz+8%
    L3 Cache
    4 MB (total)
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256 kB (per core)
    512 kB (per core)+100%
    Process
    22 nm-51%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    Deneb (2009−2011)
    PassMark
    2,022
    2,036
    Geekbench 6 Single
    650
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i3-4330TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 810 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i3-4330TEPhenom II X4 810
    Socket
    LGA1150
    AM3
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4330TE) / not specified (Phenom II X4 810). The Core i3-4330TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Phenom II X4 810 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4330TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-4330TE rivals Embedded R-Series.

    FeatureCore i3-4330TEPhenom II X4 810
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    HD Graphics 4600
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, EPT
    Target Use
    Embedded
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Core i3-4330TE was priced at $138, while the Phenom II X4 810 came in at $175. On launch pricing ($138 vs $175), Core i3-4330TE was $37 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4330TE delivers 14.7 pts/$ vs 11.6 pts/$ for the Phenom II X4 810 — making the Core i3-4330TE the 23% better value option.

    FeatureCore i3-4330TEPhenom II X4 810
    MSRP
    $138-21%
    $175
    Performance per Dollar
    14.7+27%
    11.6
    Release Date
    2014
    2009

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.