Core i3-4370T vs Athlon X4 840
Core i3-4370T
Athlon X4 840
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4370T is positioned at rank 700 and the Athlon X4 840 is on rank 563, so the Athlon X4 840 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4370T
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 840
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-4370T | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($138) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-4370T | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+447%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($138) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4370T and Athlon X4 840
Core i3-4370T
The Core i3-4370T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,361 points. Launch price was $138.
Athlon X4 840
The Athlon X4 840 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,331 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4370T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X4 840 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 840 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-4370T versus 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 840 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 840 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i3-4370T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon X4 840 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4370T scores 3,361 against the Athlon X4 840's 3,331 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-4370T.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+6% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4 MB+1500% |
| Process | 22 nm-21% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,361 | 3,331 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4370T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X4 840 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Athlon X4 840 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4370T) / not specified (Athlon X4 840). The Core i3-4370T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Athlon X4 840 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4370T targets Desktop Low Power.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop Low Power | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-4370T launched at $138 MSRP, while the Athlon X4 840 debuted at $102. At current prices ($138 vs $25), the Athlon X4 840 is $113 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4370T delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 133.2 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 840 — making the Athlon X4 840 the 138.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | Athlon X4 840 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138 | $102-26% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $138 | $25-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4 | 133.2+446% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-4370T and Athlon X4 840
