
Core i3-4370T

FX-4150
Core i3-4370T vs FX-4150 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4370T vs FX-4150 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4370T vs FX-4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4370T
2015Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while FX-4150 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌0.7% HIGHER MSRP$138 MSRPvs$137 MSRP
FX-4150
2012Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($137 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,327 vs 3,361).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4370T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-4370T better than FX-4150?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4370T vs FX-4150 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4370T
The Core i3-4370T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,361 points. Launch price was $138.

FX-4150
The FX-4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4370T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4150 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4150 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-4370T versus 4 GHz on the FX-4150 — a 19.2% clock advantage for the FX-4150 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i3-4370T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-4150 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4370T scores 3,361 against the FX-4150's 3,327 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-4370T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4370T vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-4150.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4 MB+1500% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 3,361+1% | 3,327 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4370T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4150 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4370T) / not specified (FX-4150). The Core i3-4370T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-4150 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4370T targets Desktop Low Power.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop Low Power | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4370T was priced at $138, while the FX-4150 came in at $137. On launch pricing ($138 vs $137), FX-4150 was $1 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4370T delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 24.3 pts/$ for the FX-4150 — making the Core i3-4370T the 0.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138 | $137 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4 | 24.3 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















