Core i3-4370T vs FX-4150
Core i3-4370T
FX-4150
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4370T is positioned at rank 700 and the FX-4150 is on rank 702, so the Core i3-4370T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4370T
Performance Per Dollar FX-4150
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-4370T | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($138) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-4370T | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+583%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($138) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4370T and FX-4150
Core i3-4370T
The Core i3-4370T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,361 points. Launch price was $138.
FX-4150
The FX-4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4370T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4150 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4150 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-4370T versus 4 GHz on the FX-4150 — a 19.2% clock advantage for the FX-4150 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i3-4370T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-4150 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4370T scores 3,361 against the FX-4150's 3,327 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-4370T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4370T vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-4150.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4 MB+1500% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 3,361+1% | 3,327 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4370T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4150 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4370T) / not specified (FX-4150). The Core i3-4370T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-4150 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4370T targets Desktop Low Power.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop Low Power | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-4370T launched at $138 MSRP, while the FX-4150 debuted at $137. At current prices ($138 vs $20), the FX-4150 is $118 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4370T delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 166.3 pts/$ for the FX-4150 — making the FX-4150 the 148.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4370T | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138 | $137 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $138 | $20-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4 | 166.3+582% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-4370T and FX-4150
