Core i3-7167U vs Core i5-4340M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7167U vs Core i5-4340M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7167U vs Core i5-4340M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7167U

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics 650, while Core i5-4340M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,368 vs 3,380).

Core i5-4340M

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7167U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4340M better than Core i3-7167U?

Yes. Core i5-4340M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4340M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4340M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4340M still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-4340M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7167U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-7167U vs Core i5-4340M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7167U

The Core i3-7167U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,368 points. Launch price was $304.

Core i5-4340M

The Core i5-4340M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,380 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-7167U and Core i5-4340M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7167U versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-4340M — a 25% clock advantage for the Core i5-4340M (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-7167U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4340M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7167U scores 3,368 against the Core i5-4340M's 3,380 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-4340M. Both processors carry 3 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-7167U	Core i5-4340M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.6 GHz+29%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	3 MB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,368	3,380

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-7167U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4340M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-7167U	Core i5-4340M
Socket	BGA1356	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7167U) / not specified (Core i5-4340M). The Core i3-7167U includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics 650), while the Core i5-4340M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7167U targets Mobile.