Core i3-7167U vs Xeon W3565
Core i3-7167U
Xeon W3565
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-7167U is positioned at rank 531 and the Xeon W3565 is on rank 827, so the Core i3-7167U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7167U
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3565
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-7167U | Xeon W3565 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($69) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-7167U | Xeon W3565 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($69) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-7167U and Xeon W3565
Core i3-7167U
The Core i3-7167U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,368 points. Launch price was $304.
Xeon W3565
The Xeon W3565 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,391 points. Launch price was $70.
Processing Power
The Core i3-7167U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon W3565 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W3565 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7167U versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3565 — a 21.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W3565 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-7167U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W3565 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7167U scores 3,368 against the Xeon W3565's 3,391 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W3565. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7167U vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3565.
| Feature | Core i3-7167U | Xeon W3565 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.46 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Bloomfield (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 3,368 | 3,391 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 513 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,726 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-7167U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3565 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-7167U versus DDR3-1066 on the Xeon W3565 — the Core i3-7167U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7167U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 24 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-7167U) vs 3 (Xeon W3565). PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i3-7167U) vs 36 (Xeon W3565) — the Xeon W3565 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i3-7167U | Xeon W3565 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1356 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133+33% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 3+50% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 36+200% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7167U) vs Yes (Xeon W3565). The Core i3-7167U includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics 650), while the Xeon W3565 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7167U targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i3-7167U | Xeon W3565 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-7167U and Xeon W3565
