Core i3-7167U vs Core i7-6498DU

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7167U vs Core i7-6498DU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7167U vs Core i7-6498DU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7167U

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics 650, while Core i7-6498DU needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,368 vs 3,372).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Core i7-6498DU

2015

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7167U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6498DU better than Core i3-7167U?

Yes. Core i7-6498DU is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-6498DU is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6498DU is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6498DU still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-6498DU comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7167U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-7167U vs Core i7-6498DU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7167U

The Core i3-7167U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,368 points. Launch price was $304.

Core i7-6498DU

The Core i7-6498DU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,372 points. Launch price was $393.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-7167U and Core i7-6498DU share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7167U versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-6498DU — a 10.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-6498DU (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-7167U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-6498DU uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7167U scores 3,368 against the Core i7-6498DU's 3,372 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-6498DU. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7167U vs 4 MB on the Core i7-6498DU.

Feature	Core i3-7167U	Core i7-6498DU
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+12%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	3,368	3,372

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7167U) / not specified (Core i7-6498DU). The Core i3-7167U includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics 650), while the Core i7-6498DU requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7167U targets Mobile.