Core i5-10210Y
VS
FX-8100

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-8100

Intel

Core i5-10210Y

4 Cores8 Thrd512 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
VS
AMD

FX-8100

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-10210Y is positioned at rank 429 and the FX-8100 is on rank 928, so the Core i5-10210Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10210Y

#417
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
568%
#418
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
560%
#419
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
514%
#420
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
512%
#421
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
507%
#423
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
490%
#424
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
469%
#425
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
469%
#426
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
456%
#429
Core i5-10210Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8100

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
22836%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
21578%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15667%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4720%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3739%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3271%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1873%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1849%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1683%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1683%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1664%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1619%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1597%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1590%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1576%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
99%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
98%
#928
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
100%
#930
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
99%
#932
Pentium E6800
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#933
Core i3-530
MSRP: $113|Avg: $15
98%
#935
Athlon II X3 405e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#936
Core i3-2105
MSRP: $138|Avg: $30
98%
#937
Core i3-3225
MSRP: $172|Avg: $167
97%
#938
Athlon II X3 400e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#939
Athlon II X2 245e
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
96%
#940
Core i3-3220T
MSRP: $149|Avg: $146
96%
#941
Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $77
96%
#942
Pentium G630T
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
96%
#943
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-10210Y (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-10210YFX-8100
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-Y (2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8100 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-10210YFX-8100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10210Y and FX-8100

Intel

Core i5-10210Y

The Core i5-10210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,131 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

FX-8100

The FX-8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,095 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10210Y packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-8100 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8100 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus 3.7 GHz on the FX-8100 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10210Y (base: 1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-10210Y uses the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8100 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10210Y scores 4,131 against the FX-8100's 4,095 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-10210Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,079 vs 455, a 81.4% lead for the Core i5-10210Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,380 vs 1,621 (37.9% advantage for the Core i5-10210Y). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10210Y vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-8100.

FeatureCore i5-10210YFX-8100
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+8%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
2.8 GHz+180%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
8 MB+3100%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake-Y (2019)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
4,131
4,095
Geekbench 6 Single
1,079+137%
455
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,380+47%
1,621
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10210Y uses the UTFCBGA1377 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8100 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3 2133 MHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-8100 — the Core i5-10210Y supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core i5-10210Y) vs 0 (FX-8100) — the Core i5-10210Y offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i5-10210Y) and AMD 990FX,AMD 970 (FX-8100).

FeatureCore i5-10210YFX-8100
Socket
UTFCBGA1377
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3 2133 MHz
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-8100 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-10210Y) vs AMD-V (FX-8100). The Core i5-10210Y includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 615), while the FX-8100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10210Y targets Mobile Low Power.

FeatureCore i5-10210YFX-8100
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile Low Power