Core i5-10210Y vs FX-8100

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-8100 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10210Y

4 / 8

4,131

+0.9%

4,095

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-8100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-8100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10210Y

2019

Why buy it

✅+137.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 615, while FX-8100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

FX-8100

2011

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (455 vs 1,079).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,621 vs 2,380).
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core i5-10210Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10210Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10210Y better than FX-8100?

Yes. Core i5-10210Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 46.8% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10210Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10210Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 46.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10210Y is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-10210Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-8100 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (13.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10210Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10210Y vs FX-8100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10210Y

The Core i5-10210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,131 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-8100

The FX-8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,095 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10210Y packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-8100 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8100 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus 3.7 GHz on the FX-8100 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10210Y (base: 1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-10210Y uses the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8100 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10210Y scores 4,131 against the FX-8100's 4,095 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-10210Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,079 vs 455, a 81.4% lead for the Core i5-10210Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,380 vs 1,621 (37.9% advantage for the Core i5-10210Y). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10210Y vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-8100.

Feature	Core i5-10210Y	FX-8100
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+8%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.8 GHz+180%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+3100%	8 MB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-Y (2019)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	4,131	4,095
Geekbench 6 Single	1,079+137%	455
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,380+47%	1,621

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10210Y uses the UTFCBGA1377 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8100 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3 2133 MHz on the Core i5-10210Y versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-8100 — the Core i5-10210Y supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core i5-10210Y) vs 0 (FX-8100) — the Core i5-10210Y offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i5-10210Y) and AMD 990FX,AMD 970 (FX-8100).

Feature	Core i5-10210Y	FX-8100
Socket	UTFCBGA1377	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3 2133 MHz+14%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	10	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-8100 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-10210Y) vs AMD-V (FX-8100). The Core i5-10210Y includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 615), while the FX-8100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10210Y targets Mobile Low Power.