PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +53.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $22 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 53.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-10400T

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,789 vs 13,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Core i5-10400F

2020

Core i5-10400T

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +53.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $22 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 53.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,789 vs 13,029).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i5-10400T?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 53.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 33.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 53.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 33.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is $22 cheaper on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $182 MSRP, and it gives you a 53.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 51.4% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 53.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Core i5-10400T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-10400T
1080p
low	192 FPS	180 FPS
medium	152 FPS	144 FPS
high	123 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	146 FPS
medium	119 FPS	115 FPS
high	97 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	68 FPS
medium	70 FPS	58 FPS
high	55 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-10400T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-10400T
1080p
low	326 FPS	111 FPS
medium	318 FPS	97 FPS
high	290 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	70 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	99 FPS
medium	292 FPS	87 FPS
high	267 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	87 FPS
medium	258 FPS	77 FPS
high	235 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	51 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-10400T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-10400T
1080p
low	326 FPS	245 FPS
medium	326 FPS	245 FPS
high	326 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	245 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	245 FPS
medium	326 FPS	245 FPS
high	326 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	245 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	245 FPS
medium	326 FPS	245 FPS
high	289 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	215 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-10400T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-10400T
1080p
low	326 FPS	245 FPS
medium	326 FPS	245 FPS
high	326 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	245 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	245 FPS
medium	326 FPS	245 FPS
high	326 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	245 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	245 FPS
medium	326 FPS	245 FPS
high	326 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	245 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Core i5-10400T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Core i5-10400T

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Core i5-10400T

The Core i5-10400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,789 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Core i5-10400T share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-10400T — a 17.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-10400T's 9,789 — a 28.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,272, a 13.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-10400T.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-10400T
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+19%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	—
PassMark	13,029+33%	9,789
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454+14%	1,272
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400T).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-10400T
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400T). The Core i5-10400T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-10400T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i5-10400T rivals Ryzen 5 3400GE.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Core i5-10400T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Low Power Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400T debuted at $182. On MSRP ($160 vs $182), the Core i5-10400F is $22 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 53.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400T — making the Core i5-10400F the 40.9% better value option.