Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-10400T

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i5-10400T

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2020

Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-10400T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-10400T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-10400T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +25.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $22 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
  • Delivers 51.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 53.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-10400T

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (9,789 vs 13,029).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i5-10400T?
Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 25.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 33.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 33.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in $22 cheaper on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $182 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 51.4% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 53.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-10400T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

Core i5-10400T

The Core i5-10400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,789 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Core i5-10400T share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-10400T — a 17.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Core i5-10400T's 9,789 — a 28.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,272, a 13.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-10400T.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i5-10400T
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+19%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+45%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
13,029+33%
9,789
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454+14%
1,272
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400T).

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i5-10400T
Socket
LGA1200
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400T). The Core i5-10400T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Core i5-10400T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Core i5-10400T rivals Ryzen 5 3400GE.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i5-10400T
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming
Low Power Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Core i5-10400T came in at $182. On launch pricing ($160 vs $182), Core i5-10400F was $22 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 53.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400T — making the Core i5-10400F the 40.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-10400FCore i5-10400T
MSRP
$160-12%
$182
Performance per Dollar
81.4+51%
53.8
Release Date
2020
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.