PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400T vs Core i7-4960X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400T vs Core i7-4960X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400T

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $808 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
✅Delivers 436.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.8 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $990 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i7-4960X needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4960X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,789 vs 9,935).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).

Core i7-4960X

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 53.8 PassMark/$ ($990 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4960X better than Core i5-10400T?

Yes. Core i7-4960X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4960X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4960X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4960X is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-4960X comes in 444.0% more expensive on MSRP at $990 MSRP versus $182 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400T is also 436.0% better value on MSRP (53.8 vs 10.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-10400T vs Core i7-4960X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400T

The Core i5-10400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,789 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-4960X

The Core i7-4960X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,935 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400T and Core i7-4960X share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-10400T versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-4960X — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4960X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-4960X is built on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400T scores 9,789 against the Core i7-4960X's 9,935 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i7-4960X. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-10400T vs 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-4960X.

Feature	Core i5-10400T	Core i7-4960X
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache	12 MB Intel® Smart Cache	15 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	—	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	—	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark	9,789	9,935+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,272	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4960X uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400T versus DDR3-1866 on the Core i7-4960X — the Core i5-10400T supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400T) vs 4 (Core i7-4960X). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400T) vs 40 (Core i7-4960X) — the Core i7-4960X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-10400T	Core i7-4960X
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+43%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	40+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-4960X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4960X). The Core i5-10400T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-4960X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400T targets Low Power Desktop, Core i7-4960X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400T rivals Ryzen 5 3400GE.

Feature	Core i5-10400T	Core i7-4960X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400T was priced at $182, while the Core i7-4960X came in at $990. On launch pricing ($182 vs $990), Core i5-10400T was $808 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400T delivers 53.8 pts/$ vs 10.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-4960X — making the Core i5-10400T the 137.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400T	Core i7-4960X
MSRP	$182-82%	$990
Performance per Dollar	53.8+438%	10.0
Release Date	2020	2013

Search Core i5-10400T on Amazon

Search Core i7-4960X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.