
Core i5-10400T

Xeon E5-2648L V3
Core i5-10400T vs Xeon E5-2648L V3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400T vs Xeon E5-2648L V3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400T vs Xeon E5-2648L V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400T
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2648L V3 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2648L V3.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2648L V3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,789 vs 9,847).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2648L V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $182 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2648L V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2648L V3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400T.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2648L V3 better than Core i5-10400T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400T vs Xeon E5-2648L V3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400T
The Core i5-10400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,789 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2648L V3
The Xeon E5-2648L V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 9,847 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400T packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2648L V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2648L V3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-10400T versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2648L V3 — a 36.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400T (base: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2648L V3 is built on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400T scores 9,789 against the Xeon E5-2648L V3's 9,847 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2648L V3. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-10400T vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2648L V3.
| Feature | Core i5-10400T | Xeon E5-2648L V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+11% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 30 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | — | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | — | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 9,789 | 9,847 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,272 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2648L V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400T | Xeon E5-2648L V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400T) / not specified (Xeon E5-2648L V3). The Core i5-10400T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2648L V3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400T rivals Ryzen 5 3400GE.
| Feature | Core i5-10400T | Xeon E5-2648L V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












