
Core i5-14490F

EPYC 7401P
Core i5-14490F vs EPYC 7401P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-14490F vs EPYC 7401P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-14490F vs EPYC 7401P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-14490F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7401P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,621 vs 27,836).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while EPYC 7401P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7401P
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14490F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i5-14490F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-14490F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14490F better than EPYC 7401P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14490F vs EPYC 7401P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14490F
The Core i5-14490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,621 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 7401P
The EPYC 7401P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,836 points. Launch price was $1,075.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14490F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7401P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7401P has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-14490F versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401P — a 50% clock advantage for the Core i5-14490F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7401P uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14490F scores 27,621 against the EPYC 7401P's 27,836 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 7401P. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14490F vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401P.
| Feature | Core i5-14490F | EPYC 7401P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 24 / 48+140% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+67% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 27,621 | 27,836 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,510 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,600 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14490F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7401P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-14490F | EPYC 7401P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14490F) / not specified (EPYC 7401P). Primary use case: Core i5-14490F targets Mid-Range. Direct competitor: Core i5-14490F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-14490F | EPYC 7401P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mid-Range | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















