
Core i5-14490F

Xeon W-3323
Core i5-14490F vs Xeon W-3323 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-14490F vs Xeon W-3323 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-14490F vs Xeon W-3323: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-14490F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $740 less on MSRP ($209 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 350.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 132.2 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 220W, a 155W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,621 vs 27,822).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3323, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon W-3323
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14490F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 132.2 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ❌238.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i5-14490F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14490F better than Xeon W-3323?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14490F vs Xeon W-3323 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14490F
The Core i5-14490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,621 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3323
The Xeon W-3323 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,822 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14490F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3323 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-3323 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-14490F versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-3323 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-14490F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3323 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14490F scores 27,621 against the Xeon W-3323's 27,822 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-3323. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14490F vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3323.
| Feature | Core i5-14490F | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+28% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+33% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 27,621 | 27,822 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,510 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,600 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14490F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3323 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-14490F | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14490F) / not specified (Xeon W-3323). Primary use case: Core i5-14490F targets Mid-Range. Direct competitor: Core i5-14490F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-14490F | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mid-Range | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-14490F was priced at $209, while the Xeon W-3323 came in at $949. On launch pricing ($209 vs $949), Core i5-14490F was $740 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14490F delivers 132.2 pts/$ vs 29.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3323 — making the Core i5-14490F the 127.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-14490F | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $209-78% | $949 |
| Performance per Dollar | 132.2+351% | 29.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















