
Core i5-14490F

Xeon Gold 6212U
Core i5-14490F vs Xeon Gold 6212U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-14490F vs Xeon Gold 6212U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-14490F vs Xeon Gold 6212U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-14490F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6212U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6212U, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6212U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6212U
2019Why buy it
- ✅+49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14490F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,470 vs 27,621).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-14490F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-14490F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14490F better than Xeon Gold 6212U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-14490F vs Xeon Gold 6212U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-14490F
The Core i5-14490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,621 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6212U
The Xeon Gold 6212U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,470 points. Launch price was $2,000.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14490F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6212U offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6212U has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-14490F versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6212U — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-14490F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6212U uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14490F scores 27,621 against the Xeon Gold 6212U's 27,470 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-14490F. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14490F vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6212U.
| Feature | Core i5-14490F | Xeon Gold 6212U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 24 / 48+140% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+28% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+49% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 24 MB+1820% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 27,621 | 27,470 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 2,510 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,600 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14490F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6212U uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-14490F | Xeon Gold 6212U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14490F) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6212U). Primary use case: Core i5-14490F targets Mid-Range. Direct competitor: Core i5-14490F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-14490F | Xeon Gold 6212U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mid-Range | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














