Core i5-4670T vs Core i7-2860QM

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670T vs Core i7-2860QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670T vs Core i7-2860QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670T

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2860QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,488 vs 4,597).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $189 MSRP, while Core i7-2860QM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2860QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-2860QM

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Core i5-4670T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2860QM better than Core i5-4670T?

Yes. Core i7-2860QM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-2860QM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2860QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2860QM is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-2860QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $189 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4670T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4670T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4670T vs Core i7-2860QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670T

The Core i5-4670T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,488 points. Launch price was $220.

Core i7-2860QM

The Core i7-2860QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,597 points. Launch price was $568.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4670T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2860QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4670T versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-2860QM — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-2860QM (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-4670T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-2860QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670T scores 4,488 against the Core i7-2860QM's 4,597 — a 2.4% lead for the Core i7-2860QM. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670T vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2860QM.

Feature	Core i5-4670T	Core i7-2860QM
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	4,488	4,597+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2860QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4670T	Core i7-2860QM
Socket	LGA1150	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-4670T) / true (Core i7-2860QM). The Core i7-2860QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i5-4670T requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2860QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.